SandstormvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Sandstorm | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Web Hosting | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 7 078 | 117 967 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +5 608 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 65/100 for Sandstorm, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Sandstorm.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).
Sandstorm details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Sandstorm, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with