# sandboxed.sh vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sandboxed.sh | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #97 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 673 | 78 720 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +1 996 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, unsloth is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+1 996 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sandboxedsh-vs-unsloth