# sandboxed.sh vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sandboxed.sh | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #97 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 678 | 56 874 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +145 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sandboxedsh-vs-typst