# sandboxed.sh vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sandboxed.sh | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #97 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 682 | 8 553 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +84 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sandboxedsh-vs-tube-archivist