# sandboxed.sh vs Shields

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sandboxed.sh | Shields |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #97 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 678 | 27 331 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +125 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Shields scores 80/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shields.

If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.

Shields is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)
- [Shields](https://selfhost.directory/project/shields) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shields.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sandboxedsh-vs-shields