# SandBase Harness vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SandBase Harness | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #169 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 637 | 8 553 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +84 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.

SandBase Harness ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, SandBase Harness is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SandBase Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sandbase-harness-vs-tube-archivist