# SandBase Harness vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SandBase Harness | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #169 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 636 | 47 724 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +17 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for SandBase Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; SandBase Harness needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SandBase Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sandbase-harness-vs-text-generation-webui