SaleorvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Saleor | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 23 487 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +118 | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 80 | 28 |
| Latest release | 3.23.45 · 28 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 75/100 for Saleor, so it is the safer default.
Saleor ships more often: 80 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Saleor needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
Saleor details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Saleor, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with