# Saki Panel vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Saki Panel | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 27 in Server Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 89 727 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 388 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 44/100 for Saki Panel, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Saki Panel.

If you want the quickest setup, Saki Panel is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 388 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Saki Panel](https://selfhost.directory/project/saki-panel) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/saki-panel.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/saki-panel-vs-world-monitor