# Saki Panel vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Saki Panel | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 27 in Server Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 44/100 for Saki Panel, so it is the safer default.

Saki Panel ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Saki Panel needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Saki Panel](https://selfhost.directory/project/saki-panel) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/saki-panel.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/saki-panel-vs-upptime