# sagetv vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sagetv | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #66 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 287 | 13 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 48/100 for sagetv, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sagetv.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; sagetv needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sagetv](https://selfhost.directory/project/sagetv) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sagetv.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sagetv-vs-stash