# ryot vs Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ryot | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 ✓ | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 ✓ | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

ryot scores 63/100 against 53/100 for Web Rendering Proxy (WRP), so it is the safer default.

Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.

If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.

ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)
- [Web Rendering Proxy (WRP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wrp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ryot-vs-wrp