# ryot vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ryot | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

ryot scores 63/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

ryot ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ryot-vs-uncompressed