# ryot vs Tile38

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ryot | Tile38 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 8 in Geospatial |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 9 751 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 ✓ | 1.38.0 · 9 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Tile38 scores 66/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Tile38 is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.

ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)
- [Tile38](https://selfhost.directory/project/tile38) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tile38.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ryot-vs-tile38