# ryot vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ryot | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 ✓ | 1 370 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ryot scores 63/100 against 55/100 for tapflow, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.

ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ryot-vs-tapflow