# ruTorrent vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ruTorrent | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 2 188 | 47 726 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +19 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 62/100 for ruTorrent, so it is the safer default.

ruTorrent ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; ruTorrent needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+19 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ruTorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rutorrent-vs-text-generation-webui