# ruTorrent vs Syslog-ng

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ruTorrent | Syslog-ng |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 2 189 | 2 386 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | PHP | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Syslog-ng scores 66/100 against 62/100 for ruTorrent, so it is the safer default.

ruTorrent ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Syslog-ng.

If you want the quickest setup, Syslog-ng is easier to run; ruTorrent needs more configuration.

## Details

- [ruTorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent.md)
- [Syslog-ng](https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syslog-ng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rutorrent-vs-syslog-ng