# ruTorrent vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ruTorrent | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 188 | 114 285 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +3 537 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 62/100 for ruTorrent, so it is the safer default.

ruTorrent ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 537 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ruTorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rutorrent-vs-supabase