rustypastevsSonarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rustypaste | Sonarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 86 in File Sharing | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 214 | 17 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +965 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 34 |
| Latest release | v0.18.1 · 7 Sept 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Sonarr scores 81/100 against 56/100 for rustypaste, so it is the safer default.
Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for rustypaste.
If you want the quickest setup, rustypaste is easier to run; Sonarr needs more configuration.
Sonarr is growing faster right now (+965 stars in 30 days).
rustypaste details →Sonarr details →
Swap a project
Keep rustypaste, compare it with
Keep Sonarr, compare it with