# RustFS vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustFS | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 35 508 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 676 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

RustFS scores 74/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 676 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustfs-vs-wbo