# RustFS vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustFS | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 35 504 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 772 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

RustFS scores 74/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 772 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustfs-vs-urbit