# RustFS vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustFS | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 35 502 | 56 868 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 770 ✓ | +139 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 770 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustfs-vs-typst