# RustFS vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustFS | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 35 519 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 687 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

RustFS scores 74/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 687 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustfs-vs-tube-archivist