# RustFS vs Apache Tika

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustFS | Apache Tika |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 35 502 ✓ | 4 114 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 770 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

RustFS scores 74/100 against 68/100 for Apache Tika, so it is the safer default.

RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.

If you want the quickest setup, Apache Tika is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 770 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)
- [Apache Tika](https://selfhost.directory/project/tika) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tika.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustfs-vs-tika