# RustFS vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustFS | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 508 | 114 271 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 676 | +3 523 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 523 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustfs-vs-supabase