# RustFS vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustFS | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 35 502 | 45 672 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 770 ✓ | +840 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 770 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustfs-vs-sentry