# RustDesk Server vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustDesk Server | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 630 | 12 825 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +174 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

RustDesk Server scores 74/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

RustDesk Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

RustDesk Server is growing faster right now (+174 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RustDesk Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustdesk-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustdesk-server.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustdesk-server-vs-zookeeper