# RustDesk Server vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustDesk Server | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 10 628 ✓ | 6 048 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +179 ✓ | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

RustDesk Server scores 75/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

RustDesk Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

## Details

- [RustDesk Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustdesk-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustdesk-server.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustdesk-server-vs-zammad