# RustDesk Server vs tobab

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | RustDesk Server | tobab |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop | #34 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 10 632 ✓ | 155 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +176 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

RustDesk Server scores 74/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

RustDesk Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; tobab needs more configuration.

RustDesk Server is growing faster right now (+176 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [RustDesk Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustdesk-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustdesk-server.md)
- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rustdesk-server-vs-tobab