# rushdb vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rushdb | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Vector Database | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 89 721 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 382 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.

rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 382 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rushdb](https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rushdb-vs-world-monitor