# rushdb vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rushdb | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Vector Database | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.

rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.

## Details

- [rushdb](https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rushdb-vs-upptime