# rushdb vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rushdb | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Vector Database | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 29 391 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +112 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.

rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.

SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rushdb](https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rushdb-vs-srs