# ruptime vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ruptime | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #17 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 213 | 35 795 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +834 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 45/100 for ruptime, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ruptime.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ruptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ruptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ruptime.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ruptime-vs-seaweedfs