runitorvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| runitor | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #25 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 361 | 4 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.4.1-build.6 · 17 Mar 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | 0BSD | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Tika scores 68/100 against 49/100 for runitor, so it is the safer default.
runitor ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, runitor is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.
Apache Tika is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
runitor details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep runitor, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with