runitorvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| runitor | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #25 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 361 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.4.1-build.6 · 17 Mar 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | 0BSD | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 49/100 for runitor, so it is the safer default.
runitor ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, runitor is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
runitor details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep runitor, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with