# rudderstack vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rudderstack | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 ✓ | 2 922 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +120 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

rudderstack and Zot Registry score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Zot Registry.

If you want the quickest setup, Zot Registry is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rudderstack-vs-zot-registry