rudderstackvsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 2 922 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +120 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
rudderstack and Zot Registry score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Zot Registry.
If you want the quickest setup, Zot Registry is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →Zot Registry details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep Zot Registry, compare it with