rudderstackvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 6 521 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +109 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with