rudderstackvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with