rudderstackvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
rudderstack scores 64/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
rudderstack details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with