# rudderstack vs verdaccio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rudderstack | verdaccio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 17 956 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +57 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 29 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

verdaccio scores 76/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 29 for verdaccio.

If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)
- [verdaccio](https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/verdaccio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rudderstack-vs-verdaccio