# rudderstack vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rudderstack | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 93 040 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +1 246 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 246 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rudderstack-vs-uptime-kuma