# rudderstack vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rudderstack | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +83 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rudderstack-vs-tube-archivist