# rudderstack vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rudderstack | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 114 268 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +3 520 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 520 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rudderstack-vs-supabase