# rudderstack vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rudderstack | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 95 273 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +2 311 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 25 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rudderstack-vs-stirling-pdf