rudderstackvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +298 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with