# rudderstack vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rudderstack | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 35 794 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +869 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 ✓ | 28 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rudderstack-vs-seaweedfs