ruddervsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudder | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Configuration Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 719 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 6 |
| Latest release | 9.1.4 · 7 Aug 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Scala | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 55/100 for rudder, so it is the safer default.
rudder ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
rudder details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep rudder, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with