ruddervsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudder | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 719 | 35 798 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +837 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 28 |
| Latest release | 9.1.4 · 7 Aug 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Scala | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 55/100 for rudder, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for rudder.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; rudder needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+837 stars in 30 days).
rudder details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep rudder, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with