ruddervsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudder | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Configuration Management | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 719 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 2 |
| Latest release | 9.1.4 · 7 Aug 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Scala | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 63/100 against 55/100 for rudder, so it is the safer default.
rudder ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; rudder needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
rudder details →ryot details →
Swap a project
Keep rudder, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with